From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gause

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2015
125 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Summary

affirming denial of motion for leave to amend the complaint

Summary of this case from Caruso v. HSBC Private Bank

Opinion

14156 4600/11

02-05-2015

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shenee Gause, Defendant-Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J.), rendered on or about November 14, 2012, unanimously affirmed.


, Renwick, Feinman, Clark, Kapnick, JJ.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J.), rendered on or about November 14, 2012, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California , 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders , 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 5, 2015

CLERK


Summaries of

People v. Gause

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2015
125 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

affirming denial of motion for leave to amend the complaint

Summary of this case from Caruso v. HSBC Private Bank

affirming denial of motion for leave to amend the complaint

Summary of this case from Caruso v. HSBC Private Bank

dismissing gross negligence claim where "defendant had no duty to plaintiff independent of the contract"

Summary of this case from Lantau Holdings Ltd. v. Gen. Pac. Grp. Ltd.
Case details for

People v. Gause

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shenee Gause…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

Citations

125 A.D.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 972
999 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

Lantau Holdings Ltd. v. Gen. Pac. Grp. Ltd.

Here, SVK had no duty to Lantau independent of the contractual duties stated in the Control Agreements. See…

Grant v. Doe

"The legal relationship between a borrower and a bank is a contractual one of debtor and creditor and does…