From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ganz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1996
224 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 1, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.).


Complainant's testimony, corroborated by two police witnesses, that she sustained a red mark under her eye and suffered permanent hair loss as a result of the incident, and that she temporarily lost consciousness and felt "a lot of pain" in her back for over one week, established a "physical injury" ( People v. Bailey, 178 A.D.2d 846, 848, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 943).

The court properly declined to submit a charge of petit larceny, as a lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree, since there was no rational view of the evidence which would support a conclusion that he committed the former, but not the latter, crime ( see, People v. Scarborough, 49 N.Y.2d 364, 371).

Defendant's remaining argument is unpreserved for review, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ganz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1996
224 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Ganz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD GANZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 136

Citing Cases

People v. McDowell

However, more substantial bruising, swelling, and lacerations have been sufficient. People v. Terrero, 31…

People v. Jackson

As a result, he sustained bruises and discoloration in those areas and suffered from pain for three weeks. A…