From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2005
14 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5119

January 20, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J.), rendered September 6, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8½ to 17 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Marlow and Ellerin, JJ.


Defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses his claim that the trial court failed to exercise its sentencing discretion ( see People v. Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v. Diaz, 304 AD2d 468, lv denied 100 NY2d 561). Were we to conclude otherwise, we would find this claim to be unpreserved and unavailing. Even if we were to conclude that the court mistakenly believed that it had no discretion to impose a lower sentence, there would be no need to remand for resentencing because the court expressed no reservations about the agreed-upon sentence ( id.).

The appeal waiver also forecloses defendant's excessive sentence claim, and if we were to find otherwise, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2005
14 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Fishman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LLOYD FISHMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
787 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

People v. Watson

The oral colloquy, in which the court separated the right to appeal from the rights automatically given up by…

People v. Seymour

The record does not support defendant's contention. Rather, we conclude that the comments of the court did…