From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2003
304 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

925

April 24, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered June 11, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of conspiracy in the first degree and two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 18 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Priscilla Steward, for respondent.

Brian W. Stull, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach, Friedman, JJ.


Defendant waived his right to appeal the sentence which, in the present circumstances, is not illegal (People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273). Thus, the argument that the sentencing court failed to exercise the appropriate discretion is not open to review. In any event, a court's expression of an erroneous belief that it lacks any sentencing discretion following a negotiated plea (see People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302) will warrant a remand for resentencing only where the record indicates possible harm flowing from the court's error, such as some indication of reservation by the court as to the fairness of the sentence to be imposed (see People v. Barzge, 244 A.D.2d 213, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 889; People v. Rizzo, 209 A.D.2d 235, 236, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 913). There is no such indication here. Accordingly, there is no basis for a remand for resentencing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2003
304 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALFRED DIAZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 731

Citing Cases

People v. Seymour

The record does not support defendant's contention. Rather, we conclude that the comments of the court did…

People v. Pena

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Even if we were to conclude that the court that imposed…