From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Earket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 31, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J. — Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v. Sparrow, 222 A.D.2d 1114, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 977). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.

Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Earket

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Earket

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHNNIE T. EARKET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

Snitzel v. Murry

On direct appeal, the Fourth Department held that "[b]y failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to…

People v. Snitzel

Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction,…