From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sparrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently enter that plea (see, People v Jordan, 215 A.D.2d 257; People v Bridges, 186 A.D.2d 298). Defendant's waiver of the right to appeal encompassed the right to challenge whether affording defendant the opportunity to participate in a treatment program prior to sentencing constituted an impermissible term of "interim probation" and whether the sentence is harsh or excessive (see, People v Allen, 82 N.Y.2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). Lastly, we reject the contention that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).


Summaries of

People v. Sparrow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Sparrow

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID SPARROW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 705

Citing Cases

People v. Vallejo

Memorandum: The record establishes that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived the right…

PEOPLE v. LA VALLEY

Defendant appeals. Initially, by waiving his right to appeal defendant waived his right to challenge whether…