From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 31, 2017
902 N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155141 COA: 326666

10-31-2017

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kejuan Marcell DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge , 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Wilder, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.


Summaries of

People v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 31, 2017
902 N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kejuan Marcell…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

902 N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2017)

Citing Cases

Douglas v. Bauman

In an order entered on October 31, 2017, the supreme court noted that, in lieu of granting leave to appeal,…