From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Debruyn

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2016
877 N.W.2d 894 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152529. COA No. 328363.

05-02-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Cody James DEBRUYN, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Livingston Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Debruyn

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 2, 2016
877 N.W.2d 894 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Debruyn

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Cody James…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 2, 2016

Citations

877 N.W.2d 894 (Mich. 2016)

Citing Cases

DeBruyn v. Nagy

The Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court for re-sentencing in light of People v.…

DeBruyn v. Michigan

The Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court for re-sentencing in light of People v.…