From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 1992
187 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (James J. Leff, J.).


The evidence at trial, which included eyewitness testimony, established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant intentionally caused physical injury with a dangerous instrument (Penal Law § 120.05). The complainant, after making a purchase in a bakery in Grand Central Station, was attacked by defendant for no apparent reason with a shopping bag containing bricks that was still in defendant's possession when she was arrested soon after the incident. Since defendant denied the attack, there was no reasonable view of the evidence that she was guilty of assault in the third degree by recklessly or negligently causing physical injury (Penal Law § 120.00, [3]), and the court thus properly refused to charge a lesser included offense (CPL 300.50; see, People v Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 64).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 1992
187 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. David

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAUREN DAVID, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

People v. Barnes [1st Dept 1999

While it is true that the circumstance that an act was deliberate does not necessarily preclude a finding of…

People v. Barnes [1st Dept 1999

While it is true that the circumstance that an act was deliberate does not necessarily preclude a finding of…