From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2008
48 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-03267.

February 13, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), dated March 22, 2006, which denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643) on his convictions of, inter alia, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on August 13, 2003.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Melissa J. Feldman on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643). Since the defendant was, at the time of his motion, less than three years from being eligible for release on parole ( see L 2005, ch 643, § 1; Correction Law § 851), he did not qualify for resentencing ( see People v McCurdy, 46 AD3d 843; People v Corley, 45 AD3d 857; People v Nolasco, 37 AD3d 622; People v Parris, 35 AD3d 891; People v Bautista, 26 AD3d 230).


Summaries of

People v. Dathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2008
48 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Dathan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY DATHAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1369
849 N.Y.S.2d 901

Citing Cases

People v. Edell

Ordered that the order is affirmed. The County Court properly denied the defendant's motion for resentencing…

People v. Beasley

In this case, as a result of the defendant's successful application for a reduced sentence on his prior A-I…