From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cservak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 27, 1997

Appeal from County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.)


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not err in failing to afford him the opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing sentence. When the defendant fails to comply with a condition of his or her plea agreement, the court is not bound by its original sentencing promise and may unilaterally impose an enhanced sentence ( see, People v. Thorpe, 189 A.D.2d 903; People v. Gamble, 111 A.D.2d 869).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, JOY, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cservak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 1997
243 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Cservak

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN J. CSERVAK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 310