From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 17, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Defendant contends that the County Court erred by not affording him an opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty before imposing a higher sentence than that originally negotiated in the plea agreement. Although that is the usual rule ( Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257), it does not apply to the instant case. Taken as a whole, the record indicates the clear intent of the court to condition the promised sentence upon the defendant's appearance on the date scheduled for sentencing. Because defendant absconded and failed to appear on the scheduled date, the court was no longer bound by its promise and was free to impose a higher sentence ( see, People v. Innes, 111 A.D.2d 356; People v McDaniels, 111 A.D.2d 876; People v. Davis, 106 A.D.2d 657; People v. Chevalier, 92 A.D.2d 944). Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gamble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Gamble

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY GAMBLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Warren

Although that is the usual rule (see, Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257), it does not apply to the instant…

People v. Viken

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (People v…