From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crawford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2012
96 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-20

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Donovan CRAWFORD, appellant.

Yasmin Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.


Yasmin Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered May 10, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the People failed to produce legally sufficient evidence of his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree in light of his defense of temporary innocent possession, and that the verdict of guilt was against the weight of the evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( seeCPL 470.15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053,cert. denied 542 U.S. 946, 124 S.Ct. 2929, 159 L.Ed.2d 828;People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902). Contrary to the defendant's contention, his conduct was not consistent with innocent possession ( see generally People v. Williams, 50 N.Y.2d 1043, 1045, 431 N.Y.S.2d 698, 409 N.E.2d 1372;People v. Sooknanan, 92 A.D.3d 810, 810, 938 N.Y.S.2d 467,lv. denied18 N.Y.3d 998, 945 N.Y.S.2d 653, 968 N.E.2d 1009;People v. Hawkins, 258 A.D.2d 472, 472, 685 N.Y.S.2d 253).

RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crawford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2012
96 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Donovan CRAWFORD, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5015
946 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

That black pouch contained the weapon that defendant was charged with possessing. “A person may be found to…

People v. Fields

Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (…