From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Colley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1632) KA 01-00079

December 21, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.)

PRESENT: HAYES, J.P., SCUDDER, BURNS, GORSKI AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant did not object to the sentence imposed, nor did she move to withdraw her plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction. Defendant therefore failed to preserve for our review her contention that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence ( see, People v. Perry, 252 A.D.2d 990, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 929). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Contrary to defendant's contention, the court did not impose an enhanced sentence. The court informed defendant before she entered her plea that a fine would be imposed as part of the sentence and that the maximum fine would be $5,000. The further contention of defendant concerning the severity of the sentence does not survive her waiver of the right to appeal ( see, People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827).


Summaries of

People v. Colley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Colley

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICKIE L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 449

Citing Cases

People v. Holmes

Defendant did not object to the enhancement of his sentence, nor did he move to withdraw his plea of guilty…