Opinion
25 KA 21-00940
02-03-2023
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ADAM J. COLBERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KEEM APPEALS, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
KEEM APPEALS, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered January 7, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated, as a class E felony.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Henry, 207 A.D.3d 1062, 1062-1063 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 940 [2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.