From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cervino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 15, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.), rendered May 18, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Mangano, P. J., O'Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that the court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without conducting a hearing. Since the defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his contentions, and the court was able to make an informed decision, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing ( see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927; People v Jaworowski, 201 AD2d 504). Moreover, the defendant's motion was without merit ( see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; see also, People v Rogers, 228 AD2d 623; People v Kelly, 198 AD2d 305; People v Bourdonnay, 160 AD2d 1014, 1015).


Summaries of

People v. Cervino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1996
232 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Cervino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PATRICK CERVINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Here, the record reveals that the defendant was lucid, rational, and unequivocal in assuring the court that…

People v. Fernandez

The defendant's contentions in support of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, including his assertion…