From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. CARDILLO, DI LORENZO, AUSFELD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 1981
80 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

March 12, 1981


Appeals from orders of the County Court of Montgomery County, entered May 27, 1980, which suppressed certain physical evidence. The New York State Commission of Investigation (SIC), on or about May 23, 1977, secured search warrants for certain premises and the person of the defendant Cardillo from a Justice of the Supreme Court in New York County. The defendants were indicted in April of 1979 for crimes based upon the evidence seized on May 24, 1977. Defendants moved to suppress that evidence as illegally seized and the County Court granted the motion. This appeal by the People ensued. As held by the County Court, the recent case of Matter of B.T. Prods. v. Barr ( 44 N.Y.2d 226) is dispositive of the issue. The court found in the Barr case that it is not sufficient that the person applying for a warrant be authorized by law to apply for a warrant, but the agency for which he is acting must also be authorized to seek warrants. (pp 234, 235.) The County Court carefully examined the statutes creating the SIC (L 1958, ch 989, § 1 et seq.) and found that the SIC had no powers except investigative and that there was no specific grant of the power to seek warrants in aid of its investigations (People v. Mitchell, 40 A.D.2d 117, 121). Upon these appeals, the People have not shown any substantial distinction between this case and the Barr decision and we agree with the County Court that the evidence must be suppressed. Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents. Sweeney, J.P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. CARDILLO, DI LORENZO, AUSFELD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 1981
80 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. CARDILLO, DI LORENZO, AUSFELD

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CARMEN CARDILLO, JOHN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Matter of Lees

endant cannot utilize the demand for discovery pursuant to CPL 240.20, because the computers are not in the…

In re Lees

nt cannot utilize the demand for discovery pursuant to CPL § 240.20, because the computers are not in the…