From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Caraballo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1995
222 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 11, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions on appeal are largely unpreserved for review and, to the extent that they are unpreserved, we decline to address them in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 22; People v Ford, 66 N.Y.2d 428, 441; People v Jones, 173 A.D.2d 487).

The defendant's contentions that are preserved for review are either without merit (see, e.g., People v Autry, 75 N.Y.2d 836, 838; People v Huertas, 75 N.Y.2d 487, 493; People v Hill, 212 A.D.2d 1063; People v Hill, 209 A.D.2d 224; People v Celestino, 201 A.D.2d 91, 97; People v Jones, 200 A.D.2d 441; People v Candelario, 198 A.D.2d 512, 513; People v Louis, 192 A.D.2d 558; People v Graziano, 151 A.D.2d 775), or do not warrant reversal in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Schaeffer, 56 N.Y.2d 448, 455; People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Ritter, J.P., Altman, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Caraballo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1995
222 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Caraballo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDDY CARABALLO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 544