Opinion
January 9, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, William Donnino, J., Phylis Bamberger, J.
Defendant's constitutional speedy trial claim was properly denied since "the allegations in his motion papers did not spell out a legal basis for relief" ( People v Lomax, 50 N.Y.2d 351, 358; see, People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). Furthermore, appellate "review is precluded by lack of an adequate record that includes, among other things, the minutes of any adjournments" ( People v Brisko, 219 A.D.2d 493, 494). It is thus impossible to ascertain the reasons for delay ( People v Taranovich, supra, at 445).
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.