From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brisko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1995
219 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 19, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme County (Clifford Scott, J.).


Defendant's plea of guilty operated as a waiver of his statutory speedy trial claim under CPL 30.30 ( People v Friscia, 51 N.Y.2d 845; People v Penna, 203 A.D.2d 392, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 830). Defendant's constitutional speedy trial claim, raised pro se, was properly rejected without a hearing for failure to adduce facts concerning the claimed delay (CPL 210.45; People v Price, 145 A.D.2d 445, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 895). Insofar as that issue was raised by counsel in a motion that was served on the People but never filed with the court, review is precluded by lack of an adequate record that includes, among other things, the minutes of any adjournments ( People v Anderson, 216 A.D.2d 257; People v James, 188 A.D.2d 296).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Brisko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1995
219 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Brisko

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ORLANDO BRISKO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

People v. Velez

Upon an independent review of the facts, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence…

People v. Rincon

In any event, the defendant has failed to provide an adequate record for the review of this issue since the…