From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brooks

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 14, 2020
187 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2017–01759 Ind. No.1879/16

10-14-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. David BROOKS, Appellant.

Steven A. Feldman, Manhasset, NY, for appellant. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.


Steven A. Feldman, Manhasset, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Timothy P. Mazzei, J.), rendered January 23, 2017, convicting him of attempted identity theft in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was involuntary because the County Court did not advise him of the possible immigration consequences of his plea (see generally People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 ). Under the circumstances of this case, where nothing in the record contradicts the defendant's statement made under oath, at the plea proceeding, that he was a citizen of the United States, or the information in the Department of Probation Presentence Investigation Report indicating that the defendant was a United States citizen, we reject the defendant's contention (see People v. Williams, 178 A.D.3d 1095, 115 N.Y.S.3d 401 ; People v. Tull, 159 A.D.3d 1387, 1387–1388, 72 N.Y.S.3d 675 ).

Although the County Court lacked discretion at sentencing to defer the mandatory surcharge (see People v. Jones, 26 N.Y.3d 730, 732–733, 27 N.Y.S.3d 431, 47 N.E.3d 710 ), the court's error in this regard, which was in the defendant's favor, does not entitle him to the relief he seeks (see People v. Himonitis, 174 A.D.3d 738, 739, 102 N.Y.S.3d 445 ; People v. Tietje, 171 A.D.3d 1221, 1222, 96 N.Y.S.3d 878 ).

MASTRO, J.P., AUSTIN, LEVENTHAL and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brooks

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 14, 2020
187 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. David Brooks…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2020

Citations

187 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
187 A.D.3d 931
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 5768

Citing Cases

People v. Sawyer

( Roman , 160 A.D.3d at 1492, 72 N.Y.S.3d 899 ; seePeque , 22 N.Y.3d at 183, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617…

People v. Sawyer

Furthermore, "preservation was not required inasmuch as the record bears no indication that defendant knew…