From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bristol

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 28, 2016
499 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152862. COA No. 322285.

06-28-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Rodney Leroy BRISTOL, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Bristol

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 28, 2016
499 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Bristol

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Rodney Leroy…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2016)
880 N.W.2d 534

Citing Cases

Bristol v. Winn

Petitioner subsequently filed an application for leave to appeal in the Michigan Supreme Court, raising the…