Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Super. Ct. No. CRF07-1313
BUTZ, J.Pursuant to a negotiated settlement, defendant Jeffrey Scott Brewer pleaded guilty to misdemeanor identify theft (Pen. Code, § 530.5, subd. (a)) and felony grand theft (§ 487, subd. a)). Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on formal probation for five years. Restitution fines of $200 were imposed in accordance with sections 1202.4, subdivision (b) and 1202.44; the latter was stayed pending successful completion of probation. Defendant was ordered to pay victim restitution of $51,800 plus a surcharge of $5,180 “with all but $2,800 to be reduced by any amount paid by [the] codefendant.” Defendant was ordered to serve one year in the county jail.
Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Using the misappropriated identification information of a man in Oklahoma City, defendant and an accomplice obtained funds from two credit unions to purchase two Chevrolet pickup trucks from an automobile dealer where defendant was employed as a salesman.
Defendant appeals.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: SCOTLAND, P.J., BLEASE, J.