From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brabham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 2009
66 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

October 22, 2009.

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward and Michael R. Ambrecht, JJ., at pleas; Michael R. Ambrecht, J., at sentence), rendered June 30, 2006, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 4 to 8 years and 1 ½ to 3 years, respectively, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and to the extent of directing that the sentences be served concurrently, and otherwise affirmed.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Renwick and Richter, JJ.


We find there are "mitigating circumstances" (Penal Law § 70.25 [2-c]) warranting a concurrent sentence for bail jumping, and that the imposition of a consecutive sentence was excessive.

We have considered and rejected defendant's argument that his bail jumping conviction should be vacated.


Summaries of

People v. Brabham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 2009
66 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Brabham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JESSE BRABHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
886 N.Y.S.2d 595

Citing Cases

People v. Brabham

The Appellate Division found that there were "mitigating circumstances" warranting a concurrent sentence for…