From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Berryhill

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Oct 21, 2008
No. D052983 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TYLER JOHN BERRYHILL, Defendant and Appellant. D052983 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, First Division October 21, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Frank A. Brown, Judge, Super. Ct. No. SCD210070

HALLER, J.

Tyler John Berryhill entered negotiated guilty pleas to six counts of residential burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460) and admitted he had two prior serious/violent felony or strike convictions (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and two prior serious felonies (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)). As part of the plea bargain, Berryhill also admitted an allegation under section 667.5, subdivision (c)(21) that in one of the burglaries the victim was present. At sentencing, the trial court dismissed one of the prior strike convictions and sentenced Berryhill to 27 years four months in prison.

Statutory references are to the Penal Code.

Berryhill did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.

FACTS

Between September 11, 2007 and November 6, 2007, Berryhill committed six residential burglaries. He generally entered the residences through open or unlocked windows, removed property from the homes and traveled by bicycle.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable issues: (1) whether Berryhill's plea was constitutionally valid; and (2) whether any issues related to the plea's validity can be raised on appeal.

We granted Berryhill permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represented Berryhill on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: NARES, Acting P. J., McDONALD, J.


Summaries of

People v. Berryhill

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Oct 21, 2008
No. D052983 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TYLER JOHN BERRYHILL, Defendant…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

No. D052983 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)