From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Beecham

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County
Aug 25, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 1214 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

Summary

In People v. Beecham, 25 Misc.3d 1214(A) (Sup Ct Westchester County 2009), the court found the People had demonstrated sufficient good cause shown for violating CPL 240.90(1).

Summary of this case from People v. Cherry

Opinion

August 25, 2009.


Crimes — Disclosure — Prosecutor's Motion for Discovery More than 45 Days Following Arraignment. Crimes — Disclosure — Cell Samples for DNA Testing. Criminal Procedure Law — § 240.40 (2) (Discovery; upon court order; blood samples).


Summaries of

People v. Beecham

Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County
Aug 25, 2009
25 Misc. 3d 1214 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)

In People v. Beecham, 25 Misc.3d 1214(A) (Sup Ct Westchester County 2009), the court found the People had demonstrated sufficient good cause shown for violating CPL 240.90(1).

Summary of this case from People v. Cherry
Case details for

People v. Beecham

Case Details

Full title:People v. Beecham (Roger)

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Westchester County

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

25 Misc. 3d 1214 (N.Y. Misc. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52090

Citing Cases

People v. Cherry

With respect to the existence of probable cause to believe the defendant from whom non-testimonial evidence…

People v. Matos

denied82 N.Y.2d 753, 603 N.Y.S.2d 995, 624 N.E.2d 181 [N.Y. 1993] and People v. Smith, 86 A.D.2d 251, 450…