From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Aung

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 2, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-2

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. TUN AUNG, Defendant-appellant.

The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Vincent F. Gugino of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Nicholas T. Texido of Counsel), for Respondent.



The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Vincent F. Gugino of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Nicholas T. Texido of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS AND VALENTINO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted strangulation in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 121.12), defendant contends that the superior court information (SCI) was jurisdictionally defective. We agree. The two counts charged in the SCI were not offenses for which defendant was held for action of a grand jury ( seeCPL 195.20), i.e., those two counts were not included in the felony complaint, and they were not lesser included offenses of an offense charged in the felony complaint ( see People v. Pierce, 14 N.Y.3d 564, 571, 904 N.Y.S.2d 255, 930 N.E.2d 176;People v. Menchetti, 76 N.Y.2d 473, 477, 560 N.Y.S.2d 760, 561 N.E.2d 536). “[T]he primary purpose of the proceedings upon such felony complaint is to determine whether the defendant is to be held for the action of a grand jury with respect to the charges contained therein” (CPL 180.10[1] ). Thus, “ ‘the waiver procedure is triggered by the defendant being held for [g]rand [j]ury action on charges contained in a felony complaint ... and it is in reference to those charges that its availability must be measured’ ” ( Pierce, 14 N.Y.3d at 571, 904 N.Y.S.2d 255, 930 N.E.2d 176, quoting People v. D'Amico, 76 N.Y.2d 877, 879, 561 N.Y.S.2d 411, 562 N.E.2d 488). Inasmuch as the SCI to which defendant pleaded guilty did not “include at least one offense that was contained in the felony complaint,” it was jurisdictionally defective ( People v. Zanghi, 79 N.Y.2d 815, 818, 580 N.Y.S.2d 179, 588 N.E.2d 77). That defect does not require preservation, and it survives defendant's waiver of the right to appeal and his guilty plea ( see id. at 817, 580 N.Y.S.2d 179, 588 N.E.2d 77;People v. Stevenson, 107 A.D.3d 1576, 1576, 966 N.Y.S.2d 717;People v. Cieslewicz, 45 A.D.3d 1344, 1345, 845 N.Y.S.2d 590).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, the superior court information is dismissed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.


Summaries of

People v. Aung

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 2, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Aung

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. TUN AUNG…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: May 2, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 1492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 1492
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3135

Citing Cases

People v. Stewart

In appeal No. 2, defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that his waiver of indictment and…

People v. Stewart

In appeal No. 2, defendant contends in his pro se supplemental brief that his waiver of indictment and…