From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Applewhite

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 16, 2021
No. 2021-03847 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2021-03847 Ind. 3635/16

06-16-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Christopher Applewhite, appellant.

Robert J. Marinelli, New York, NY (Heather J. Stepanek of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.


Robert J. Marinelli, New York, NY (Heather J. Stepanek of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (John T. Hecht, J.), rendered January 22, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new trial.

The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. Prior to trial, the Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion to preclude the People from introducing at trial DNA testing results and testimony concerning the Forensic Statistical Tool (hereinafter FST) or, in the alternative, for a hearing pursuant to Frye v United States (293 F 1013 [DC Cir]) to determine the admissibility of the evidence generated by the FST.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in admitting FST evidence without first holding a Frye hearing (see People v Foster-Bey, 35 N.Y.3d 959; People v Williams, 35 N.Y.3d 24). As proof of the defendant's guilt was not overwhelming without the FST evidence (see People v Pelt, 184 A.D.3d 672; People v Herskovic, 165 A.D.3d 835), the error was not harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The defendant's remaining contentions need not be reached in light of our determination.

CHAMBERS, J.P., MILLER, BRATHWAITE NELSON and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Applewhite

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 16, 2021
No. 2021-03847 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 16, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Applewhite

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Christopher…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-03847 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 16, 2021)