From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Andrews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1997
237 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 4, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered April 20, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


The prosecutor's cross-examination of defendant and summation remarks concerning a significant discrepancy between defendant's trial testimony and a post-arrest statement attributed to him by the police were proper ( People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673, cert denied 449 US 1016), notwithstanding defendant's testimony that he made no such statement ( see, People v Davis, 61 NY2d 202).

The court properly limited cross-examination of police witnesses concerning unrelated incidents ( see, People v Johnson, 228 AD2d 389, lv denied 88 NY2d 1022; People v Alston, 215 AD2d 108, lv denied 86 NY2d 732).


Summaries of

People v. Andrews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1997
237 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELVIS ANDREWS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

People v. Colburn

The minor inconsistency between the expected testimony and the actual testimony did not constitute…