From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-08991.

Decided February 17, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered September 17, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

David Zucker, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Jessica L. Melton of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's request at sentencing to relieve his third court-appointed attorney and determined that the defendant would have to represent himself ( see People v. Gloster, 175 A.D.2d 258, 260). Although an effective waiver of the right to counsel must be the product of a free and meaningful choice, a criminal defendant may be asked to choose between waiver and another course of action as long as the choice presented is not constitutionally offensive ( see Maynard v. Meachum, 545 F.2d 273, 278; People v. Robinson, 244 A.D.2d 364) . Here, the defendant voluntarily waived his right to counsel when he refused, without good cause, to cooperate with able appointed counsel ( see People v. Robinson, supra; People v. Gloster, supra).

The People met their burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was a second felony offender by producing a certificate of conviction, which identified the previously convicted individual by name and New York State Identification Number ( see CPL 60.60, 400.15[a]; People v. Melvin, 279 A.D.2d 481; People v. Richards, 266 A.D.2d 714, 715-716). The defendant's conclusory allegations were insufficient to support his contention that the prior conviction was unconstitutionally obtained ( see People v. Owens, 272 A.D.2d 481; People v. Shepard, 268 A.D.2d 540). Thus, the defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. FRANK ALLEN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 685

Citing Cases

Allen v. McGinnis

On January 21, 2004, the Appellate Division affirmed Petitioner's conviction, finding that the trial judge…

People v. Penna

The People sustained their burden of proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was previously…