Opinion
July 27, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Habeas corpus does not lie to review claimed errors which were already considered on a direct appeal (see, People ex rel. Wise v. Scully, 163 A.D.2d 444). Nor do the facts of this case indicate a violation of the petitioner's fundamental constitutional rights such as to warrant a departure from this traditional orderly procedure (see, People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.