Opinion
July 9, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Carey, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and the petitioner's pro se supplemental brief and agree with the petitioner's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Habeas corpus does not lie to review claimed errors which were already considered on a direct appeal (see, Matter of Williams v. Scully, 135 A.D.2d 721; People ex rel. Jones v. Abrams, 114 A.D.2d 481). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.