From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn v. Eash

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 19, 2023
1:22-cv-262 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-262

01-19-2023

RAYSHAWN J. PENN, Plaintiff, v. C.O. EASH, et al., Defendant.


ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 20)

MATTHEWW. McFARLAND, United States District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman (Doc. 20), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Eash in his official capacity is DISMISSED, but the excessive force claim against Defendant Eash in his individual capacity shall proceed. Additionally, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED as moot. Lastly, the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that, for the reasons outlined in the Report and Recommendations, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, Plaintiff is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Penn v. Eash

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jan 19, 2023
1:22-cv-262 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Penn v. Eash

Case Details

Full title:RAYSHAWN J. PENN, Plaintiff, v. C.O. EASH, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-262 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2023)

Citing Cases

Cook v. Trostel

, report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:22-CV-262, 2023 WL 317867 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 19, 2023). That…