From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelkey v. Cal. Lake Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 14, 2021
21-05046 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-05046 BLF (PR)

09-14-2021

MICHAEL PELKEY, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Eastern District, which transferred the matter to this district on June 30, 2021. Dkt. No. 6. The Clerk sent two separate notices to Petitioner informing him that he must file a petition on the court form and submit an in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application form or pay the filing fee within twenty-eight days from the date of the notices to avoid dismissal. Dkt. Nos. 7, 9. The deadline has passed, and Petitioner has failed to respond. Furthermore, there has been no other communication from Petitioner. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file a proper petition and pay the filing fee.

The matter was reassigned to this Court after Petitioner failed to file consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 11.

The Clerk shall terminate all pending deadlines and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pelkey v. Cal. Lake Cnty. Superior Court

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 14, 2021
21-05046 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Pelkey v. Cal. Lake Cnty. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PELKEY, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

21-05046 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)