From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peel v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1994
202 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant's motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff's subjective complaints of ringing in the ear, and her minor bruises, are insufficient to make out a prima facie case of "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the court should have granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678; Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230). Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peel v. Jordan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1994
202 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Peel v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:LYNNE PEEL, Respondent, v. MARJORIE H. JORDAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 74

Citing Cases

Congdon v. Preisman

In contrast to the facts in Preston v. Young (supra), here there is no indication that the diagnosis of…

Black v. Gordon

Their expert otorhinolaryngologist found mild hearing impairment of less than one percent, and subjective…