From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scheer v. Koubek

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1987
70 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1987)

Summary

holding threshold not met by subjective complaints of transitory pain unsupported by objective evidence

Summary of this case from Oswin v. Shaw

Opinion

Decided July 7, 1987

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, William H. Keniry, J.

James A. Lombardo for appellant.

Christine M. Galvin for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed.

Plaintiff has failed to make out her prima facie case of "serious injury" by "significant limitation of use of a body function or system" (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Plaintiff's proof that she suffered a soft tissue injury, described by her own expert as "mild," and which, at the time of trial, resulted in no restriction of plaintiff's mobility, is not a "serious injury" under the No-Fault Insurance Law. We reject the holding of the majority of the Third Department that under these circumstances, pain may form the basis of "serious injury". To so hold would undercut the policy behind the No-Fault insurance scheme to reduce the number of automobile personal injury accident cases litigated in the courts and frustrate the Legislature's attempt to put an objective verbal definition of serious injury (Licari v Elliot, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 236, 239; see, Thrall v City of Syracuse, 96 A.D.2d 715, revd on dissenting opn below 60 N.Y.2d 950, rearg denied 61 N.Y.2d 905). The subjective quality of plaintiff's transitory pain does not fall within the objective verbal definition of serious injury as contemplated by the No-Fault Insurance Law (Licari v Elliot, 57 N.Y.2d, at 239, supra).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Scheer v. Koubek

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1987
70 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1987)

holding threshold not met by subjective complaints of transitory pain unsupported by objective evidence

Summary of this case from Oswin v. Shaw
Case details for

Scheer v. Koubek

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE K. SCHEER, Respondent, v. DANIEL H. KOUBEK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1987

Citations

70 N.Y.2d 678 (N.Y. 1987)
518 N.Y.S.2d 788
512 N.E.2d 309

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Bronx Merch. Funding Servs., LLC

That is unless plaintiff can prove a "serious injury" as defined by Insurance Law §5102(d). See, Report, of…

Coward v. Delgado

As such, in order to satisfy the statutory "serious injury" threshold, objective proof of a plaintiff's…