Opinion
3:09-cv-00381-LRH-VPC
11-02-2012
RANK M. PECK, Plaintiff, v. WASHOE COUNTY; et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Before the court is Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling (#90), which the court will treat as a motion to reconsider Magistrate's Order (#83). Defendant filed a Response to Objection to Magistrate Judge's Rulings (#91).
Refers to this court's docket number.
The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the parties' pleadings, and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.
The Magistrate Judge's Order (#83) will, therefore, be sustained and Plaintiff's motion (#90) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE