From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 3, 1983
705 F.2d 944 (7th Cir. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2478.

Argued April 4, 1983.

Decided May 3, 1983.

Paul W. Grauer, Schaumburg, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Alan I. Becker, Bowles, Becker Levine, Gilbert W. Gordon, Gordon Gordon, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Marvin Aspen, Judge.

Before BAUER and POSNER, Circuit Judges and JAMESON, Senior District Judge.

Hon. William J. Jameson of the District of Montana, sitting by designation.


Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey M. Paull, brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleging that defendants-appellees, Chrysler Credit Corporation and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1631 and 1638, and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, by failing to properly disclose certain items in a retail installment contract Paull signed in connection with his purchase of an automobile from Fireside. The district court granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment in a well considered memorandum opinion and order, reported at 544 F. Supp. 848 (N.D.Ill.E.D. 1982). We are persuaded that the district court's judgment is correct. We adopt Judge Aspen's opinion and affirm the order and entry of judgment granting the motions for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 3, 1983
705 F.2d 944 (7th Cir. 1983)
Case details for

Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY M. PAULL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: May 3, 1983

Citations

705 F.2d 944 (7th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

Shields v. Lefta, Inc.

Defendant based its motion to dismiss on its alleged compliance with TILA and Regulation Z. In fact,…

Peter v. Village Imports Company

Peter's challenge to the bargain reached by the parties does not fall under the purview of TILA. TILA "is not…