From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paulk v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 15, 1996
680 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-4331.

October 15, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County, Paul Rasmussen, J.

Laura E. Keene of Beroset Keene, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Gordon Edward Welch, Pensacola, for Appellee.


We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award of permanent periodic alimony. However, the final judgment improperly requires the payment of alimony "until further order of the court." Permanent periodic alimony terminates on the death of either spouse or the remarriage of the receiving spouse. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Because the error can be corrected without a reversal, we modify the final judgment to require payment of alimony until the death of either party or the remarriage of the former wife. Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gold v. Gold, 417 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed as modified.

BOOTH, JOANOS and PADOVANO, JJ.,


Summaries of

Paulk v. Paulk

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 15, 1996
680 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Paulk v. Paulk

Case Details

Full title:T. LAWRENCE PAULK, APPELLANT, v. LINDA PAULK, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 15, 1996

Citations

680 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Aguiar v. Aguiar

The trial court awarded Appellee permanent alimony "until further order of court." However, permanent…