From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Aug 9, 2021
CIVIL 4:20-CV-794 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 4:20-CV-794

08-09-2021

KEVIN PAUL v. TRANS UNION, LLC, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SEAN D. JORDAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 21, 2021, the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #57), was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Kevin Paul's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant, Mountain Run Solutions LLC, (Dkt. #30), be granted in part and denied in part. Having assessed the Report and the record in this case, and no objections to the Report having been timely filed, the Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report should be adopted.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant, Mountain Run Solutions LLC, (Dkt. #30), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded $1,680.00 in actual damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n, 1681o; $1,000 in statutory damages under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(2)(A), 1692e(8), 1692g(a)(3); $544.45 in costs, and $12,780.45 in attorneys' fees from Defendant Mountain Run Solutions, LLC.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paul v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Aug 9, 2021
CIVIL 4:20-CV-794 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Paul v. Trans Union, LLC

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN PAUL v. TRANS UNION, LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

CIVIL 4:20-CV-794 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Capital Link Mgmt.

“‘[A] mere conclusory statement that [a] fee [is] reasonable' is insufficient for calculating the lodestar…

Onosode v. Equifax Info. Servs.

Servs., Inc., No. 6:19-CV-00352-JCB-JDL, 2020 WL 7658063, at *6 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2020), report and…