From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Sanderson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
May 24, 2006
4:05CV00871-WRW (E.D. Ark. May. 24, 2006)

Opinion

4:05CV00871-WRW.

May 24, 2006


ORDER


Pending is Defendants' Motion for an Independent Medical Examination (Doc. No. 7). Plaintiff has responded (Doc. No. 10).

It appears that most courts have held that complaints of routine mental anguish-type damages do not put a plaintiff's mental condition into play under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a). There is authority to the contrary, but, in this case, taking everything into consideration, Plaintiff's claims do not yet warrant a Rule 35 mental examination.

Stevenson v. Stanley Bostitch, Inc., 201 F.R.D. 551, 553 (N.D. Ga. 2001); see, e.g., O'Sullivan v. Minn., 176 F.R.D. 325, 327 (D. Minn. 1997).

Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of Am., 158 F.R.D. 409, 409 (N.D. Ill. 1994).

For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Independent Medical Examination is DENIED. Also pending is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 9). Defense counsel does not object. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file the Amended Complaint by 3:00 p.m. Friday, May 26, 2006. The case is set for a jury trial on September 11, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in Little Rock.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parker v. Sanderson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
May 24, 2006
4:05CV00871-WRW (E.D. Ark. May. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Parker v. Sanderson

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD PARKER, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES SANDERSON and 72 EXPRESS TRUCKING…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: May 24, 2006

Citations

4:05CV00871-WRW (E.D. Ark. May. 24, 2006)