From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Glasgow

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 22, 2017
NO. 02-15-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 02-15-00378-CV

06-22-2017

SANDRA E. PARKER APPELLANT v. ROBERT J. GLASGOW, JR.; AND GLASGOW, TAYLOR, ISHAM & GLASGOW, P.C. APPELLEES


FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. C2014011 CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION

I concur. I write separately to emphasize that my concurrence with the majority's disposition sustaining Appellant Sandra E. Parker's first and second issues is based solely on the fact that the motion for summary judgment filed by Appellees Robert J. Glasgow, Jr. and Glasgow, Taylor, Isham & Glasgow, P.C. on Parker's legal malpractice claim filed against them was a traditional motion for summary judgment seeking judgment as a matter of law. The majority's holding does not preclude the filing of a no-evidence motion for summary judgment by Appellees. With this caveat, I respectfully concur.

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE DELIVERED: June 22, 2017


Summaries of

Parker v. Glasgow

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 22, 2017
NO. 02-15-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Parker v. Glasgow

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA E. PARKER APPELLANT v. ROBERT J. GLASGOW, JR.; AND GLASGOW, TAYLOR…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jun 22, 2017

Citations

NO. 02-15-00378-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2017)