From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 28, 1958

Present — Bergan, J.P., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.


Appeal from an order of the Albany County Supreme Court Special Term denying defendant's motion to discover and inspect myelogram X rays of the plaintiff herein taken by his physician. Defendant sought to compel discovery and inspection of these X rays under section 324 of the Civil Practice Act, but the court denied the motion on the ground that such X rays are privileged under section 352 of the Civil Practice Act. Section 352 reads in part: "A person duly authorized to practice physic or surgery * * * shall not be allowed to disclose any information which he acquired in attending a patient in a professional capacity, and which was necessary to enable him to act in that capacity". The facts of this case bring it within the frame of the statute and the seal of privilege attached thereto. ( Hurd v. Republic Steel Corp., 275 App. Div. 725.) Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Parker v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Parker v. Boston and Maine Railroad

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD A. PARKER, SR., Respondent, v. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
173 N.Y.S.2d 842

Citing Cases

Kulkarni v. Kinkhabwala

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs. It is beyond cavil…