From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parada v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 20, 2024
3:22-CV-806 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2024)

Opinion

3:22-CV-806

02-20-2024

JOSE MANUEL ROMERO PARADA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, etal., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT D. MARIANI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024, upon review of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 21) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The R&R (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein.

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this action.


Summaries of

Parada v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 20, 2024
3:22-CV-806 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Parada v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MANUEL ROMERO PARADA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, etal., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 20, 2024

Citations

3:22-CV-806 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2024)

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. United States

In any event, we note that this Court has rejected virtually identical claims brought by other Lewisburg…

Luis v. United States

In any event, we note that this Court has rejected virtually identical claims brought by other Lewisburg…