Opinion
Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-PL-938
07-06-2020
David PANNELL, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Bessie E. LEONARD, Appellee-Defendant.
Appellant Pro Se: David Pannell, Pendleton, Indiana Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, Natalie F. Weiss, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana
Appellant Pro Se: David Pannell, Pendleton, Indiana
Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, Natalie F. Weiss, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana
OPINION ON REHEARING
Darden, Senior Judge.
[1] David Pannell has petitioned for rehearing of our memorandum decision dated March 3, 2020. We grant rehearing for the limited purpose of correcting a factual error in the decision but otherwise affirm.
Pannell captions his petition as a "Suggestion for Petition for Rehearing Enbanc." The Court of Appeals of Indiana does not review decisions en banc.
--------
[2] In our original decision, we stated incorrectly that on March 6, 2018, the federal district court had dismissed Pannell's complaint "with prejudice." Pannell v. Leonard , Case No. 19A-PL-938, 2020 WL 1023454, *3 (Ind. Ct. App. March 3, 2020). Whereas, the federal district court had dismissed his complaint "without prejudice," and remanded back to the trial court for consideration of any state-law claims by Pannell. Id. [3] Aside from the factual error, we affirm our original memorandum decision in all aspects.
Riley, J., and Tavitas, J., concur.