From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pankey v. Smith

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 29, 2009
CASE NO. 4:09CV617 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 29, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:09CV617.

October 29, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Benjamin R. Pankey ("Petitioner"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. # 1).

On May 20, 2009, this case was automatically referred to Magistrate Judge James S. Gallas for preparation of a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and LR 72.1. On September 22, 2009, the Magistrate issued a report and recommendation, recommending that the Court deny the instant petition because Grounds One through Five are without merit and Grounds Six and Seven are procedurally defaulted. (Dkt. # 14).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge de novo, and finds that it is well-supported. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Gallas (Dkt. # 14) is hereby ADOPTED, and Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pankey v. Smith

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 29, 2009
CASE NO. 4:09CV617 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Pankey v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN R. PANKEY, PETITIONER, v. KEITH SMITH, Warden, RESPONDENT

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 29, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 4:09CV617 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Snyder v. Buchanan

Accordingly, Ground Six has no merit. A constitutional sufficiency of the evidence challenge requires a…

Phillips v. LaRose

(Doc. 23, at 1-2.) The court is not generally inclined to require the submission of complete trial…