From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. Muze, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1998
253 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.).


Ordered that the order dated August 7, 1997, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 24, 1997, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The determination as to the terms and provisions of discovery, and the prevention of abuse by protective orders pursuant to CPLR 3103, rests in the sound discretion of the court to which the application has been made ( see, Matter of Walsh v. Design Concepts, 221 A.D.2d 454; Krygier v. Airweld, Inc., 176 A.D.2d 701). Upon our review of the record, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the relief requested by the defendants.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Page v. Muze, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 14, 1998
253 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Page v. Muze, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN PAGE, Respondent, v. MUZE, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 486

Citing Cases

Schobel v. Godwin

ORDERED that the plaintiffs and the defendant City of New York are awarded one bill of costs payable by the…

Bligen v. Markland Estates, Inc.

Here, Markland Estates, Inc., and Jay Silva failed to demonstrate prejudice. Therefore, the Supreme Court…