From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P. Cubed Enterprises, Inc. v. Roach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued September 7, 1999

October 25, 1999

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice and fraud, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the action is restored to the calendar.

Since no note of issue placing the action on the court's calendar was filed (see, CPLR 3402), the court incorrectly dismissed the action pursuant to CPLR 3404. The correct procedure to dismiss the action required a motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see, Davila v. Galarza, 221 A.D.2d 308 ). As no demand to file a note of issue within 90 days was served, dismissal under CPLR 3216 would also have been improper.

BRACKEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

P. Cubed Enterprises, Inc. v. Roach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1999
265 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

P. Cubed Enterprises, Inc. v. Roach

Case Details

Full title:P. CUBED ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., appellants, v. PETER ROACH, ETC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 889

Citing Cases

Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in restoring this action. Since no note of issue had…