From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 21, 2001.

August 13, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant Esab Group, Inc., d/b/a L-Tec Welding Cutting Systems, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 25, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to restore the action.

Barry, McTiernan Moore, New York, N.Y. (Laurel A. Wedinger of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellant.

O'Keeffe Lindgren, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Thomas K. Lindgren of counsel), for respondents.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in restoring this action. Since no note of issue had been filed, this action could not be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see, Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, A.D.2d [2d Dept., May 14, 2001]; P. Cubed Enterprises v. Roach, 265 A.D.2d 537), and the appellant did not demonstrate any other basis for dismissal.

BRACKEN, P.J., S. MILLER, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MURRAY, ET AL., respondents, v. T.W. SMITH CORPORATION, defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Ranger Insurance v. Smith

Contrary to the defendants' contention, the plaintiff was not required to meet the standards applicable to a…

David v. Interfaith Medical Center

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion to restore is granted, and the matter…