From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ouma v. Asher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 25, 2021
No. 20-36077 (9th Cir. Aug. 25, 2021)

Opinion

20-36077

08-25-2021

WASHIE OUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYLER ASHER, President of SAFECO Insurance; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted August 17, 2021

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court No. 3:19-cv-01084-HZ for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Washie Ouma appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his diversity action alleging that defendants engaged in fraud during prior state court litigation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations and under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Ouma's action as time-barred because Ouma failed to file this action within two years of the alleged fraud, and Ouma failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that equitable tolling applies. See Or. Rev. Stat. § 12.110 (two-year statute of limitations for fraud claims); Torre v. Brickey, 278 F.3d 917, 919 (9th Cir. 2002) (courts apply the forum state's substantive law when subject matter is based on diversity of citizenship, except to the extent inconsistent with federal law); see also Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005) (requirements of equitable tolling).

Contrary to Ouma's contention, the district court was not required by Ouma's pro se status to construe Ouma's "Notice to File Civil Suit" as meeting the requirements for commencing an action, which are the filing of a complaint and service of process. See Or. Rev. Stat. § 12.020.

We reject as without merit Ouma's contention that the district court made errors in its recitation of the facts of this case.

All pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ouma v. Asher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 25, 2021
No. 20-36077 (9th Cir. Aug. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Ouma v. Asher

Case Details

Full title:WASHIE OUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYLER ASHER, President of SAFECO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 2021

Citations

No. 20-36077 (9th Cir. Aug. 25, 2021)